NEPGA Comments to MA DEP on GHG Regulations
NEPGA comments to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on stakeholder draft greenhouse gas emissions regulations.
Tag Archives: Massachusetts
NEPGA Response to Massachusetts Energy Bill
NEPGA statement on passage of Massachusetts energy bill
NEPGA Comments to MA DPU on Electric Utility Gas Capacity Contracts
NEPGA comments filed with the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities raising significant questions and issues that must be addressed to appropriately consider using electric utility ratepayer financing for new natural gas capacity contracts (DPU 15-181)
NEPGA Statement on MA House Energy Bill Passage
NEPGA statement on passage of passage of a costly energy bill by the Massachusetts House of Representatives.
NEPGA Response to Massachusetts Clean Electricity Partnership Report
NEPGA response to Massachusetts Clean Electricity Partnership report on subsidized contracts for importing provincially-owned hydropower.
NEPGA Limited Intervention in MA DPU Pipeline Contracting Proceeding
NEPGA’s motion for a limited intervention in the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities consideration of proposed Eversource contracts for natural gas pipeline capacity financed by electric utility ratepayers (Docket 15-181).
NEPGA Statement on Massachusetts State of the State
NEPGA response to Massachusetts State of the State speech and Gov. Charlie Baker’s call for contracting with provincially-owned hydropower.
NEPGA Testimony on MA Carbon Tax Proposal
NEPGA testimony on Massachusetts legislative proposal to institute a carbon tax on a number of sectors including power generation (S 1747).
Statement on Announced Closure of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
NEPGA issued this statement from its President, Dan Dolan, in response to the announced closure of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station by June 2019.
NEPGA Testimony on MA Hydro Legislation
Testimony by NEPGA President Dan Dolan and Dr. Sue Tierney before the Massachusetts Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy in opposition to legislation to allow for up to 2,400 MW of provincially-owned, large-scale hydropower contracting (Senate Bill 1965)
