
Competitive Procurement – The Lowest Cost Market Solution
Competitive procurement works and should be required for all utility electricity purchases.
This category contains all documents published prior to January 1, 2014.
Competitive procurement works and should be required for all utility electricity purchases.
Competitive procurement works and should be required for all utility electricity purchases.
CRA International prepared a report at NEPGA’s request regarding the ISO New England Internal Market Monitoring Unit’s review of the forward capacity market auction results and design elements. To view the report click here. Executive Summary based on the report of Robert Stoddard of CRA International available here.
A generation production tax is simply bad policy that increases costs for consumers and harms future investment.
Utility generation ownership puts too many risks and costs on consumers when compared to competitive generation ownership.
The uniform clearing price provides the best price signal for resource development and deployment while providing cost-effective electricity for consumers.
NEPGA full page ad opposing Section 42 of Massachusetts House Bill 4225 that ran in the Bosto Globe, Boston Herald and Boston Business Journal.
Joint NEPGA/RESA open letter to Massachusetts legislators in opposition to Section 42 of Massachusetts House Bill 4225.
NEPGA letter to Massachusetts legislative conference committee commenting on Senate and House versions of passed energy legislation.
NEPGA and IPPNY sponsored an amicus brief and motion for leave to file from 21 noted economists in support of the petition submitted by EPSA and a number of other electricity associations appealing FERC’s Order 745 regarding the compensation for behind-the-meter generation as demand response.